<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tagging- a tool for journalistic transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andydickinson.net/2006/04/18/tagging-a-tool-for-journalistic-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2006/04/18/tagging-a-tool-for-journalistic-transparency/</link>
	<description>online journalism, newspaper video and digital media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1-10015</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2006/04/18/tagging-a-tool-for-journalistic-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=22#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I agree. I think there is a real discussion to be had about what transparency means long term, especially with respect to the relationship we have with our audience. In a lot of ways collaborative tools are going a long way to change and even end the relationship as we know it.  

The journalistic relationship has never really been about collaboration at the point of delivery. In some cases collaboration never really stretches past the point of a punter tipping off a journo to a story.  

One of the reasons we put pressure on institutions to be transparent is that one of our duties as journalists is to question; to ask should they be the keepers of this stuff in the first place.  That’s a question that we may find asked of us in the demands for transparency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I think there is a real discussion to be had about what transparency means long term, especially with respect to the relationship we have with our audience. In a lot of ways collaborative tools are going a long way to change and even end the relationship as we know it.  </p>
<p>The journalistic relationship has never really been about collaboration at the point of delivery. In some cases collaboration never really stretches past the point of a punter tipping off a journo to a story.  </p>
<p>One of the reasons we put pressure on institutions to be transparent is that one of our duties as journalists is to question; to ask should they be the keepers of this stuff in the first place.  That’s a question that we may find asked of us in the demands for transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2006/04/18/tagging-a-tool-for-journalistic-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=22#comment-5</guid>
		<description>For me, transparency is about being open and honest about my values and process as a journalist. As Jay Rosen at PressThink once said to me, we journalists call on all kinds of institutions to be transparent: Government, corporations, NGOs, but we're pretty poor when it comes to our own work. I think blogs and other collaborative tools recognise a new relationship with our audience, one in which our audience expects a right of reply. In my own work, a little recognition of this fact and a little engagement with my audience goes a long way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, transparency is about being open and honest about my values and process as a journalist. As Jay Rosen at PressThink once said to me, we journalists call on all kinds of institutions to be transparent: Government, corporations, NGOs, but we&#8217;re pretty poor when it comes to our own work. I think blogs and other collaborative tools recognise a new relationship with our audience, one in which our audience expects a right of reply. In my own work, a little recognition of this fact and a little engagement with my audience goes a long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
