<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspaper Video: Editing and apps. Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/</link>
	<description>online journalism, newspaper video and digital media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1-10015</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SueptpepVom</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4243</link>
		<dc:creator>SueptpepVom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-4243</guid>
		<description>tests time mashine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tests time mashine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Etzel</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3043</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Etzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-3043</guid>
		<description>I have tested the triple AAA apps (Apple, Adobe &#38; Avid).  TBH, none comes close to the speed and efficiency of SONY Vegas (and specifically Vegas Pro 8).

WHY?

Mike Jones put things in perspective for me last year about &lt;a href="http://blogs.digitalmediaonlineinc.com/digitalbasin/entry/200704131" rel="nofollow"&gt;rethinking what an NLE is&lt;/a&gt; and about the forward thinking of &lt;a href="http://blogs.digitalmediaonlineinc.com/digitalbasin/entry/20070902" rel="nofollow"&gt;editing video on Vegas&lt;/a&gt;.  Although the AAA SUITES can accomplish what is required of them - they are based on an archaic methodology of separate apps being used by separate editors.  The NLE is used by a video editor, the audio sweetening is done by an audio person, compositing is done in a compositing app by a SFX editor.  Therefore, those who ascribe to the Solo VJ paradigm, are forced to learn three distinct applications which have their own steep learning curves.

Then there's Vegas Pro.  Resource efficient and about as hardware neutral as can be for a Windows based application (Can even be used with Parallels on a MAC).  Zen like in it's interface and usage.  Transitions are one step - not 3-5 as with other apps.  Audio can be edited on the timeline and motion graphics can be handled as well.  You never have to leave Vegas unless there is something that cannot be done in Vegas - which for the VAST majority of VJ's is unlikely.  I occasionally go into Sound Forge to do some custom tweaking of audio but other than that, I stay in Vegas.

Want to add multiple video formats to the timeline - with Vegas, you just add them and keep editing - no rerendering, no waiting.  Want to change the project properties in the middle of an edit - you can do so without having to recreate it as you would in the other apps.

The problem I see is that my fellow Solo VJ's have been duped into believing that to edit video as a so called "Professional" as the spin doctoring ad wizards would have them believe, they HAVE to use a suite of applications in order to accomplish their jobs.  I &lt;a href="http://www.bluprojekt.com/vegas-pro-advocacy-why-vegas-pro-is-the-tool-for-editing-video-audio.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;posted on my blog&lt;/a&gt; why Vegas Pro is better suited for VJ'ism than any other app currently available.  It's only my viewpoint, but I feel it is pretty accurate.

Newsrooms are in budgetary crunches as is plainly stated in various Newspapers VJ discussion arenas - why not utilize existing windows based hardware and make it last longer by using an efficient application that costs 1/3 of the suites, yet accomplishes 95% of these separate apps - all in one easy to learn application?  For those who aren't primary video shooters - SONY's Vegas Studio Platinum edition can do much of what Vegas Pro 8 can - for less than $130.00.

I'm not saying that Vegas can handle Hollywood type projects, but it can do for VJ's what they need to get done - and do it in a shorter timeframe.

Cliff Etzel - Solo Video Journalist (and SONY Vegas Pro Advocate)
&lt;a href="http://www.bluprojekt.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;bluprojekt&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tested the triple AAA apps (Apple, Adobe &amp; Avid).  TBH, none comes close to the speed and efficiency of SONY Vegas (and specifically Vegas Pro 8).</p>
<p>WHY?</p>
<p>Mike Jones put things in perspective for me last year about <a href="http://blogs.digitalmediaonlineinc.com/digitalbasin/entry/200704131" rel="nofollow">rethinking what an NLE is</a> and about the forward thinking of <a href="http://blogs.digitalmediaonlineinc.com/digitalbasin/entry/20070902" rel="nofollow">editing video on Vegas</a>.  Although the AAA SUITES can accomplish what is required of them - they are based on an archaic methodology of separate apps being used by separate editors.  The NLE is used by a video editor, the audio sweetening is done by an audio person, compositing is done in a compositing app by a SFX editor.  Therefore, those who ascribe to the Solo VJ paradigm, are forced to learn three distinct applications which have their own steep learning curves.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s Vegas Pro.  Resource efficient and about as hardware neutral as can be for a Windows based application (Can even be used with Parallels on a MAC).  Zen like in it&#8217;s interface and usage.  Transitions are one step - not 3-5 as with other apps.  Audio can be edited on the timeline and motion graphics can be handled as well.  You never have to leave Vegas unless there is something that cannot be done in Vegas - which for the VAST majority of VJ&#8217;s is unlikely.  I occasionally go into Sound Forge to do some custom tweaking of audio but other than that, I stay in Vegas.</p>
<p>Want to add multiple video formats to the timeline - with Vegas, you just add them and keep editing - no rerendering, no waiting.  Want to change the project properties in the middle of an edit - you can do so without having to recreate it as you would in the other apps.</p>
<p>The problem I see is that my fellow Solo VJ&#8217;s have been duped into believing that to edit video as a so called &#8220;Professional&#8221; as the spin doctoring ad wizards would have them believe, they HAVE to use a suite of applications in order to accomplish their jobs.  I <a href="http://www.bluprojekt.com/vegas-pro-advocacy-why-vegas-pro-is-the-tool-for-editing-video-audio.html" rel="nofollow">posted on my blog</a> why Vegas Pro is better suited for VJ&#8217;ism than any other app currently available.  It&#8217;s only my viewpoint, but I feel it is pretty accurate.</p>
<p>Newsrooms are in budgetary crunches as is plainly stated in various Newspapers VJ discussion arenas - why not utilize existing windows based hardware and make it last longer by using an efficient application that costs 1/3 of the suites, yet accomplishes 95% of these separate apps - all in one easy to learn application?  For those who aren&#8217;t primary video shooters - SONY&#8217;s Vegas Studio Platinum edition can do much of what Vegas Pro 8 can - for less than $130.00.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that Vegas can handle Hollywood type projects, but it can do for VJ&#8217;s what they need to get done - and do it in a shorter timeframe.</p>
<p>Cliff Etzel - Solo Video Journalist (and SONY Vegas Pro Advocate)<br />
<a href="http://www.bluprojekt.com/" rel="nofollow">bluprojekt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Dickinson.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Newspaper Video:Editing and Apps. Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Dickinson.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Newspaper Video:Editing and Apps. Part 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-150</guid>
		<description>[...] In the last of my series (honest) on editng apps (Pt2 and 3), rather than look for an all in one application for editing, I’m looking at apps that are designed to do a specific task in the editing process – the capability of which is missing in your current app – or specific things that might be worth having in a ‘toolkit’ – you never know when you might need it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the last of my series (honest) on editng apps (Pt2 and 3), rather than look for an all in one application for editing, I’m looking at apps that are designed to do a specific task in the editing process – the capability of which is missing in your current app – or specific things that might be worth having in a ‘toolkit’ – you never know when you might need it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Hi Regina

I mentioned liquid in the First of these posts as it is now badged, in the UK anyway, as an Avid product so I included it along there. You are right though, its a neat app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Regina</p>
<p>I mentioned liquid in the First of these posts as it is now badged, in the UK anyway, as an Avid product so I included it along there. You are right though, its a neat app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 01:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-148</guid>
		<description>There's a Pinnacle option that's a step up from Studio -- Liquid, or Liquid Pro. We've been using them both versions for several years now and are quite attached. Liquid is easy (one you get past some design oddities) and fast and does very high end work for about $600. Of course, with the Avid purchase, who knows how long the higher end Pinnacle stuff will be supported?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a Pinnacle option that&#8217;s a step up from Studio &#8212; Liquid, or Liquid Pro. We&#8217;ve been using them both versions for several years now and are quite attached. Liquid is easy (one you get past some design oddities) and fast and does very high end work for about $600. Of course, with the Avid purchase, who knows how long the higher end Pinnacle stuff will be supported?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Dickinson.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Newspaper Video:Editing and Apps. Part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Dickinson.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Newspaper Video:Editing and Apps. Part 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-147</guid>
		<description>[...] In the first post I looked at the basics you should look for and the big names that you might want to consider. In the second post I concentrated on the packages that may not have the reputation but may have what you need at a price that suits. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the first post I looked at the basics you should look for and the big names that you might want to consider. In the second post I concentrated on the packages that may not have the reputation but may have what you need at a price that suits. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Good point Mark.

I'm including quicktime pro in the the last part of this series of posts. I was thinking of it as one of those apps that you may use but 'did you know it also edits' type thing. Its a powerful tool though and one worth exploring</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Mark.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m including quicktime pro in the the last part of this series of posts. I was thinking of it as one of those apps that you may use but &#8216;did you know it also edits&#8217; type thing. Its a powerful tool though and one worth exploring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Increasingly, I find myself using QuickTime Pro to put together short video reports. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles, but you can have multiple soundtracks (or export and then re-import a cleaned up soundtrack.) There are also text and other tracks available that I've only started to explore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increasingly, I find myself using QuickTime Pro to put together short video reports. It doesn&#8217;t have all the bells and whistles, but you can have multiple soundtracks (or export and then re-import a cleaned up soundtrack.) There are also text and other tracks available that I&#8217;ve only started to explore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Dickinson.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Newspaper Video: Editing and apps</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/01/28/newspaper-video-editing-and-apps-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Dickinson.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Newspaper Video: Editing and apps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=170#comment-144</guid>
		<description>[...] Andy Dickinson.net A view on Online and digital journalism      &#38;laquo; Oh God! What have we done? Newspaper Video: Editing and apps. Part 2 &#38;#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andy Dickinson.net A view on Online and digital journalism      &#38;laquo; Oh God! What have we done? Newspaper Video: Editing and apps. Part 2 &#38;#187; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
