<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How long should online video be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/03/19/how-long-should-online-video-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/03/19/how-long-should-online-video-be/</link>
	<description>online journalism, newspaper video and digital media</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew H</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/03/19/how-long-should-online-video-be/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 08:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=231#comment-266</guid>
		<description>As a very new newcomer,through work, to online video, I feel that the viewing time should 'feel right' for the subject. A news item need not be more than a minute or two, but more feature stuff can go longer. Our clips are not part of a news bulletin on tv, but viewed in isolation.When I view sites I sometimes feel a short clip is a waste of time, there just because they can do video.Longer clips feel more like a 'real film' if the subject is worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a very new newcomer,through work, to online video, I feel that the viewing time should &#8216;feel right&#8217; for the subject. A news item need not be more than a minute or two, but more feature stuff can go longer. Our clips are not part of a news bulletin on tv, but viewed in isolation.When I view sites I sometimes feel a short clip is a waste of time, there just because they can do video.Longer clips feel more like a &#8216;real film&#8217; if the subject is worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/03/19/how-long-should-online-video-be/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=231#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard

Objective editing should set the standard but which standard of editing are we using. Doco/feature standards would dictate pretty sweeping cuts but in the context of a 24/55 minute spread. That's less about time and more about the narrative. In news, yes, 1:30 is a luxurious amount of time to tell a story and for the most part I would advocate staying within that window.

But the gneral discussions seems to be that the convention can be challenged online and quality and quantity are not mutually exclusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard</p>
<p>Objective editing should set the standard but which standard of editing are we using. Doco/feature standards would dictate pretty sweeping cuts but in the context of a 24/55 minute spread. That&#8217;s less about time and more about the narrative. In news, yes, 1:30 is a luxurious amount of time to tell a story and for the most part I would advocate staying within that window.</p>
<p>But the gneral discussions seems to be that the convention can be challenged online and quality and quantity are not mutually exclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kendall</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/03/19/how-long-should-online-video-be/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=231#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Objective editing is the same in any news medium.

In local news, basic reports shouldn't last longer than 1 minute 30. Once a deeper, stronger narrative becomes apparent, then time shouldn't be a constrictive factor.

Quality should always take precedence over quantity in any medium where there is strong competition for the audience's attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objective editing is the same in any news medium.</p>
<p>In local news, basic reports shouldn&#8217;t last longer than 1 minute 30. Once a deeper, stronger narrative becomes apparent, then time shouldn&#8217;t be a constrictive factor.</p>
<p>Quality should always take precedence over quantity in any medium where there is strong competition for the audience&#8217;s attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/03/19/how-long-should-online-video-be/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=231#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Christian.

Enjoyed the videos on your site. I think they would make even better multimedia though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian.</p>
<p>Enjoyed the videos on your site. I think they would make even better multimedia though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#38;#187; Monday squibs</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/03/19/how-long-should-online-video-be/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#38;#187; Monday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=231#comment-262</guid>
		<description>[...] How long should online video be? Andy Dickinson continues to ponder the question and track down answers. The emerging consensus seems to be: find a good story and take the time you really need, which is the tough part. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How long should online video be? Andy Dickinson continues to ponder the question and track down answers. The emerging consensus seems to be: find a good story and take the time you really need, which is the tough part. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/03/19/how-long-should-online-video-be/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=231#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Here is our answer: 10 - 15 minutes. It needs only the right story.

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is our answer: 10 - 15 minutes. It needs only the right story.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
