<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If I had a hammer&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/</link>
	<description>online journalism, newspaper video and digital media</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=276#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Hi Angela

We can do both. My point was to makes sure that we always bear in mind that we want to do both and don't let the economics of supply and demand get in the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Angela</p>
<p>We can do both. My point was to makes sure that we always bear in mind that we want to do both and don&#8217;t let the economics of supply and demand get in the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 03:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=276#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I certainly would hate it if I had to forego producing hard-hitting documentary types of pieces to instead produce a whole bunch of senseless video snippets. Then I would argue against it. But why can't we do both? Have some people who work on the deep projects, some who produce mainly dailies in addition to other responsibilities (like writing), some who may occasionally do both? It seems like news orgs have enough people to do all of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly would hate it if I had to forego producing hard-hitting documentary types of pieces to instead produce a whole bunch of senseless video snippets. Then I would argue against it. But why can&#8217;t we do both? Have some people who work on the deep projects, some who produce mainly dailies in addition to other responsibilities (like writing), some who may occasionally do both? It seems like news orgs have enough people to do all of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=276#comment-340</guid>
		<description>Hi Angela

I suppose that when I generalise I inevitably end up having to add a lot of caveats to what I write. In some respects comments help me do that and yours is spot on and I cant disagree with any of what you say.

In the context of the comments I was making about Rosenblums approach I think we can all recognise that a lot of effort being made to dismantle the huge machine that is video news (and here Im not just talking about Rosenblums purge style but also the cold hard econmics that have seen many big news orgs ditch their TV investments).  Talk of producing a &#38;#34;ton o videos&#38;#34; just makes me hope that we don't fond ourselves mimicking the rolling video days of old.

I don't think we will in any major way but it doesnt hurt to say it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Angela</p>
<p>I suppose that when I generalise I inevitably end up having to add a lot of caveats to what I write. In some respects comments help me do that and yours is spot on and I cant disagree with any of what you say.</p>
<p>In the context of the comments I was making about Rosenblums approach I think we can all recognise that a lot of effort being made to dismantle the huge machine that is video news (and here Im not just talking about Rosenblums purge style but also the cold hard econmics that have seen many big news orgs ditch their TV investments).  Talk of producing a &#38;#34;ton o videos&#38;#34; just makes me hope that we don&#8217;t fond ourselves mimicking the rolling video days of old.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we will in any major way but it doesnt hurt to say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If I had a nail-gun....</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>If I had a nail-gun....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=276#comment-339</guid>
		<description>[...] Two problems - first, his blog post was a lot better than fine, but secondly and more importantly the time stamp on his blog post was earlier than the time stamp on mine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two problems - first, his blog post was a lot better than fine, but secondly and more importantly the time stamp on his blog post was earlier than the time stamp on mine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=276#comment-338</guid>
		<description>I subscribe to Rosenblum's blog, but I find it really hard to read his talking-in-circles style of writing. I have too many other things to read to try to puzzle out that mess of metaphor and philosophy.

I'm not advocating cutting anyone out of the loop of video production. I would NEVER want another editor to touch the stuff that I shoot. I know that some reporters/photographers who take up cameras will have the same feeling. My all means, let them edit!

However, not every video must be an award-winning documentary piece. Most will just be short deadline videos that just serve the purpose of complementing a story. The reporters who shoot them will be really busy and won't always be able to fit video editing into their hectic schedules. A video editor will keep things running smoothly and allow news orgs to produce a ton of videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I subscribe to Rosenblum&#8217;s blog, but I find it really hard to read his talking-in-circles style of writing. I have too many other things to read to try to puzzle out that mess of metaphor and philosophy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not advocating cutting anyone out of the loop of video production. I would NEVER want another editor to touch the stuff that I shoot. I know that some reporters/photographers who take up cameras will have the same feeling. My all means, let them edit!</p>
<p>However, not every video must be an award-winning documentary piece. Most will just be short deadline videos that just serve the purpose of complementing a story. The reporters who shoot them will be really busy and won&#8217;t always be able to fit video editing into their hectic schedules. A video editor will keep things running smoothly and allow news orgs to produce a ton of videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=276#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter.

I agree. The division of labour is a valid reason to go the team approach and you're right a cohesive team is they key. I think most newspaper outfits are working (by necessity) in a good balance but I do worry that some of the bigger outfits will find themselves getting so far in the production line that it resembles TV practice and then there is a whole world of mistakes to make there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter.</p>
<p>I agree. The division of labour is a valid reason to go the team approach and you&#8217;re right a cohesive team is they key. I think most newspaper outfits are working (by necessity) in a good balance but I do worry that some of the bigger outfits will find themselves getting so far in the production line that it resembles TV practice and then there is a whole world of mistakes to make there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2007/06/01/if-i-had-a-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andydickinson.com/?p=276#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Interesting post - there are certainly advantages to &#38;#34;division of labor&#38;#34; it is after all what the productivity and wealth of all the large economies are built on.

But there are also efficiencies and other advantages in having one person take a from concept through completion

1. Just like a photographer a videographer has a feel for the money shots - he doesnt need to review the whole tape.

2. All the responsibility for the finished piece lies with one person.

3. The &#38;#34;voice&#38;#34; of the piece is often stronger with a 1 man show.

Obviously cohesive team and good communication can overcome all these problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post - there are certainly advantages to &#38;#34;division of labor&#38;#34; it is after all what the productivity and wealth of all the large economies are built on.</p>
<p>But there are also efficiencies and other advantages in having one person take a from concept through completion</p>
<p>1. Just like a photographer a videographer has a feel for the money shots - he doesnt need to review the whole tape.</p>
<p>2. All the responsibility for the finished piece lies with one person.</p>
<p>3. The &#38;#34;voice&#38;#34; of the piece is often stronger with a 1 man show.</p>
<p>Obviously cohesive team and good communication can overcome all these problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
