links for 2008-03-11

Newspaper Video: The european way.

EJC video training

There seems to be a flurry of video activity in the aftermath of the DNA2008 conference.

One of the sponsors, the European Journalism Centre, has announced a video for newspaper journalists course and picks up a lot of information and quotage from DNA delegates.

The site is worth a look, with some nice round-ups and thoughts from a range of media execs.

They have also put up my open post to newspaper execs and editors about video. It’s nice to be part of the debate

UK webcast roundup

Mike Butcher at Techcrunch UK has a great round up of UK efforts at webcasting:

Without access to a potential audience of millions in the US and the subsequent advertising revenues, video webcasts on this side of the pond have been patchy affairs. And especially in the realm of tech business news the content tends to be thin on the ground.

A great round up with some great examples.  Well worth a visit.

Times online and google maps

Times online map

I got a very nice mention on the Times website today. The Times’ Communities editor Tom Whitwell (thanks Tom) has added to a survey they did for the upcoming budget with a “now legally-required Google maps mashup

The map was built using Yahoo pipes and google maps, based on a post of mine with a little google forms magic built in. (Later: Just to clarify, that’s about the sum of my advice here. My boss just asked me when I started working with the Times!)

I mentioned in my post that, combined with Google forms, turning surveys in to ‘geotagged’ surveys is pretty darn easy.

As Journalism.co.uk reports

“The Times has a long history of commissioning opinion polls,” wrote Tom Whitwell, Communities Editor, Times Online, about the origin of the survey.

“These are scientifically rigorous, using a carefully selected panel of maybe 1,000 people. At Times Online, we can do things very differently. We can throw out questions to our readers and capture their mood quickly, cheaply and easily.

He admits the online poll isn’t that rigorous but it offers a cheap and easy way to add depth to your content.

Great stuff and it gives me a great example to show the students.

Journalists and online etiquette

The latest column by The Guardian’s Readers’ editor Siobhain Butterworth, makes interesting reading. It tackles the sticky issue of community interaction

When five Guardian writers took part in a discussion about a music blog post in December, a reader complained that their intervention was “heavy-handed” and that the topic chosen was deliberately provocative. The author of the piece, who contributed to the discussion, agrees that the talk thread was “a bit pugilistic” and a couple of comments from Guardian writers matched that tone. How should journalists conduct themselves in online conversations?

Its a nice trip around some of the issues but one defence was a bit hollow

“You can see why journalists might be reluctant to join online conversations. Imagine that you arrive at the office one morning, you take your coat off and you’re just sitting down when a crowd of masked strangers bursts in, gathers around your desk and spends the rest of the day making derisory comments about the way you do your job. Work, for journalists whose newspaper columns are posted online, can sometimes feel a bit like that.”

Might seem like a valid point but as one (of many) who commented points out

 Yes, but occupation I chose does not require me to share my thoughts and insights with the population in print. I guess if you have elected to carve a career out of telling the great british public what you think, and demonstrating how terribly well informed and insightful you are about a topic, then it seems fair enough that they are given the opportunity to challenge your point of view, correct inaccuracies, whatever.

Another commentator is more succinct

Sorry Siobhan, but that won’t do. Those masked strangers are not random assailants, they are your journalists’ clients, customers and audience.

Overall, Butterworth said it was the view of most journalists that “they should hold themselves to higher standards of behaviour than other contributors.” It’s a good point but a difficult balance to strike given that change in relationship.

If the ground shifts beneath your feet the tempation is to take a step back to more familiar, isolated ground where the audience are a homogeneous mass to be tolerated.  Higher standards, yes. More distance, no.

links for 2008-03-09

links for 2008-03-04