<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a professional camera in the House?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andydickinson.net/2010/04/14/is-there-a-professional-camera-in-the-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2010/04/14/is-there-a-professional-camera-in-the-house/</link>
	<description>online and digital journalism, newspaper video and digital media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:01:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://www.andydickinson.net/2010/04/14/is-there-a-professional-camera-in-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-8988</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andydickinson.net/?p=1797#comment-8988</guid>
		<description>I think vDSLR&#039;s have great potential - but not purely for aesthetic reasons. Sure it&#039;s great we can have proper lenses and get shallow depth of field etc, but the real reason it&#039;s a game changer is the financial element.

I bought the Canon 550d this week, for just under £700. It&#039;s a boon not for amateurs, but for professional film makers who can now offer high quality and in some cases cinematic looking film ...but at a fraction of the price established production companies with big Oxford Street offices will charge. 

If a new generation of VJs/film makers exploit that, then the game could change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think vDSLR&#8217;s have great potential &#8211; but not purely for aesthetic reasons. Sure it&#8217;s great we can have proper lenses and get shallow depth of field etc, but the real reason it&#8217;s a game changer is the financial element.</p>
<p>I bought the Canon 550d this week, for just under £700. It&#8217;s a boon not for amateurs, but for professional film makers who can now offer high quality and in some cases cinematic looking film &#8230;but at a fraction of the price established production companies with big Oxford Street offices will charge. </p>
<p>If a new generation of VJs/film makers exploit that, then the game could change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

